Caviar Stick Eyeshadow Sugarfrost dupes and alternatives Laura Mercier
4.5 (4,815)·Nude · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 33% ingredient overlap
Differences: 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (74%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (26%)4.8 (290)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Looks identical · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (18%)4.5 (671)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 53% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: modern beige, java jazz, & cocoa dip
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Powder rather than stick (format)· 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Dewy rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Dewy rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than nude· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: champagne with silver & gold flecks
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$20.01 less (59%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Lighter· Peach rather than nude· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Peach rather than nude · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (79%)4.5 (2,019)
Glitter
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: warm beige with multi-colored glitter
Differences: Taupe rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (74%)4.2 (2,863)
Matte · Buildable
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Morphe ChromaPlus 6-Pan Eyeshadow Palette in Rich Glitch, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Sugarfrost. Matched on pan 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSugarfrostClosest shade matchRich GlitchHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#ddc1ab#e1c3b0Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumLightCloseDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall38
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Format15%35StickPaletteDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 71/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Pro Longwear Paint Pot Cream Eyeshadow in Bare Study, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Sugarfrost. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSugarfrostClosest overall alternativeBare StudyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%76#ddc1ab#dfb9a4Close colourColour difference 4.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumLightCloseDepth difference 2.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$22.01 less (65%)
Sephora
