Caviar Stick Eyeshadow Au Naturel dupes and alternatives Laura Mercier
4.5 (4,815)·Nude · Neutral · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte· Same format: stick
Differences: Brown rather than nude· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Looks identical · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 33% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (50%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$8 less (24%)4.1 (537)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 33% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (18%)4.5 (671)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 53% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 53% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Taupe rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
33
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Grey rather than nude· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than nude · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Taupe rather than nude· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Taupe rather than nude · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Mauve rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Mauve rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Green rather than nude· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Green rather than nude · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
ILIA Eye Stylus Shadow Stick - Long-Lasting Cream Eyeshadow in Single shade, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Au Naturel. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAu NaturelClosest shade matchSingle shadeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#c9a295#cba295Looks identicalColour difference 0.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNeutralNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared35
Finish65%20MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall68
Longevity50%3524-hour wear12-hour wearDifferent12-hour wear claimed against 24-hour wear
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%0Normal, Dry, CombinationSensitiveDifferentMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 73/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Ulta Beauty Collection Cream Eye Shadow Stick in Beige, Pls, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Au Naturel. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAu NaturelClosest overall alternativeBeige, PlsHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#c9a295#c9a299Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNeutralNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared97
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%85StickCreamCloseCream rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall70
Longevity50%4024-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 94/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$9 less (26%)
