Caviar Stick Eyeshadow Tailored Denim dupes and alternatives Laura Mercier
4.5 (4,815)·Blue · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (50%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Metallic rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
32
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (26%)4.8 (290)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than blue· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
28
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than blue · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Green rather than blue· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
32
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Green rather than blue · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than blue· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
20
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than blue · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (50%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
27
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Green rather than blue· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
21
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Green rather than blue · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
25
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
65
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 15-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light blue to lavendar duo chrome
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than blue· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
23
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than blue · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$8 less (24%)4.7 (1,256)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Purple rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Purple rather than blue · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (56%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Duochrome rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
25
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Duochrome rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: duochrome icy blue with pink reflects
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (74%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Green rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
25
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Green rather than blue · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: bright medium blue w/ cool undertone
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
46
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Purple rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Purple rather than blue · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Glitter rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
28
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: icy baby blue with silver and aqua sparkle
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (74%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Terracotta rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
14
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Terracotta rather than blue · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Duochrome rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Duochrome rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: sheer iridescent blue sparkle
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Glitter rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
19
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Midnight blue metallic with indigo & baby blue shimmer/Smoky lilac with opal sparkle
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (56%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Duochrome rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
25
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Duochrome rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: duochrome aqua with lime green reflects
Kaja Beauty Bento Stacked Eyeshadow Trio in Blueberry Bingsu, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Tailored Denim. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTailored DenimClosest shade matchBlueberry BingsuHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%87#89aace#8ea6c8Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BlueBlueSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%4024-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Peekablue Matte, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Tailored Denim. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTailored DenimClosest overall alternativePeekablue MatteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%81#89aace#849fc2Close colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%87LightLightSameDepth difference 5.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100BlueBlueSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall85
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%45StickLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall73
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 85/100Shade match 87/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.