Caviar Stick Eyeshadow Rosegold dupes and alternatives Laura Mercier
4.5 (4,815)·Rose · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick
Differences: Nude rather than rose· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Looks identical · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 33% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (26%)4.6 (3,381)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$8 less (24%)4.7 (1,256)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Powder rather than stick (format)· 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Pink rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Pink rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Taupe rather than rose· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than rose · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Satin rather than shimmer (finish)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than rose· Powder rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than rose · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$20.01 less (59%)4.4 (1,922)
Metallic
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Pink rather than rose· Dewy rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Pink rather than rose · Dewy rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Nudestix Magnetic Luminous Eye Color in Angel, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Rosegold. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRosegoldClosest shade matchAngelHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#cfa496#d0a290Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNeutralUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall48
Longevity50%3124-hour wear11-hour wearDifferent11-hour wear claimed against 24-hour wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Makeup By Mario Long-Wear Cream Eyeshadow in Pink Pearl, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Rosegold. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRosegoldClosest overall alternativePink PearlHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%92#cfa496#d5a392Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.