Caviar Stick Eyeshadow Moonlight dupes and alternatives Laura Mercier
4.5 (4,815)·Silver · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Lighter· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Mauve rather than silver· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than silver · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: metallic pewter silver with sparkling reflects
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than silver· 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than silver · 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than silver· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Close colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than silver · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: taupe metallic with warm silvery shimmer/
holographic foil with shifts of pink, silver & gold sparkle
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than silver· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than silver · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Taupe rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Taupe rather than silver · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Both claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than silver· 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
30
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than silver · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than silver· Dewy rather than metallic (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than silver · Dewy rather than metallic (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Golden rather than silver· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than silver · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Taupe rather than silver· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than silver · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than silver· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than silver · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Taupe rather than silver· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Taupe rather than silver · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than silver· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than silver · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: a shimmering taupe with silver, pink & gold sparkle / a neutral taupe
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Taupe rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Taupe rather than silver · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Nude rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Nude rather than silver · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: a shimmering neutral beige / a rich navy blue
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than silver· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than silver · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than silver· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than silver · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Taupe rather than silver· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Slight colour difference · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Taupe rather than silver · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: golden metallic taupe with rich tawny shimmer/ holographic blushed gold with shifts of silver & gold sparkle
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Taupe rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 33% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Taupe rather than silver · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than silver· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than silver · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than silver· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than silver · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
15
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Kaja Eye Bento Bouncy Eyeshadow Trio in Cold Brew Einspanner, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Moonlight. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMoonlightClosest shade matchCold Brew EinspannerHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%85#ac948a#a89490Very close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100SilverSilverSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared76
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPaletteDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%4024-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Milani Gilded Eyeshadow Sticks in Sterling, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Moonlight. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMoonlightClosest overall alternativeSterlingHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%75#ac948a#b19f93Close colourColour difference 4.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%88MediumLightCloseDepth difference 5.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100SilverSilverSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared97
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$30 less (88%)
