Caviar Stick Eyeshadow Sepia dupes and alternatives Laura Mercier
4.5 (4,815)·Brown · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: metallic copper brown with silver reflects
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick
Differences: Copper rather than brown· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 33% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than brown · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: white chocolate, rosy velvet, & brownie bite
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than brown· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than brown · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Normal rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: cool-toned taupe with silver shimmer
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick
Differences: Deeper· Bronze rather than brown· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 33% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Bronze rather than brown · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: stick
Differences: Golden rather than brown· 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than brown · 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 34% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Copper rather than brown· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than brown · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 53% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Nude rather than brown· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Nude rather than brown · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Dewy rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Dewy rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: rich caramel bronze / tan marble glow
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Bronze rather than brown· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Bronze rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (74%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Very close colour
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 36M Wood, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Sepia. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSepiaClosest shade match36M WoodHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#b07863#ab765dVery close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall33
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%45StickLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall68
Longevity50%6024-hour wear16-hour wearSome difference16-hour wear claimed against 24-hour wear
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 72/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Saie SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear in Gelato, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Sepia. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSepiaClosest overall alternativeGelatoHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%89#b07863#b27e66Very close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall68
Longevity50%6024-hour wear16-hour wearSome difference16-hour wear claimed against 24-hour wear
Overall match 88/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
34 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$9 less (26%)
