Caviar Stick Eyeshadow Strike A Rose dupes and alternatives Laura Mercier
4.5 (4,815)·Terracotta · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Pink rather than terracotta· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than terracotta · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Copper rather than terracotta· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 53% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than terracotta · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than terracotta· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than terracotta · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Plum rather than terracotta· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than terracotta · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (18%)4.5 (671)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Pink rather than terracotta· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than terracotta · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than terracotta· 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than terracotta · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Pink rather than terracotta· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than terracotta · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than terracotta· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than terracotta · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than terracotta· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than terracotta · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than terracotta· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than terracotta · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Taupe rather than terracotta· Powder rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than terracotta · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Bronze rather than terracotta· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Bronze rather than terracotta · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 14-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Pink rather than terracotta· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than terracotta · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 53% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than terracotta · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
about-face Fractal Glitter Eye Paint in Digital Demise, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Strike A Rose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeStrike A RoseClosest matchDigital DemiseHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%88#c08885#be887fVery close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.50 less (69%)
Sephora
