Caviar Stick Eyeshadow Mixed Metals dupes and alternatives Laura Mercier
4.5 (4,815)·Golden · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light champagne gold with silver sparkle
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (26%)4.8 (290)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than golden· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than golden· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Taupe rather than golden · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: taupe topper shimmer with silver flecks
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)· 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than golden· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than golden · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than golden· Dewy rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than golden · Dewy rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (26%)4.8 (290)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Bronze rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Bronze rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick
Differences: Copper rather than golden· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than golden · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than golden· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 33% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than golden · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than golden· 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than golden · 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Taupe rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than golden· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than golden · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Taupe rather than golden· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than golden · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than golden· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 53% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Both claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than golden· 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
30
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than golden · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than golden· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$10.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.50 less (69%)4.2 (1,248)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than golden · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than golden· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (18%)4.5 (1,590)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than golden · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Charlotte Tilbury Eyes To Mesmerise Cream Eyeshadow in Oyster Pearl, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Mixed Metals. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMixed MetalsClosest matchOyster PearlHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#a88983#a9857dVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared97
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%85StickCreamCloseCream rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall73
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 91/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (18%)
