Caviar Stick Eyeshadow Cobblestone dupes and alternatives Laura Mercier
4.5 (4,815)·Taupe · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (26%)4.6 (3,381)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· 10-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
34
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · 10-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: delicate beiges illuminated by a powder pink holo twist.
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (50%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Deeper· Grey rather than taupe· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Grey rather than taupe · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 33% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (26%)4.8 (290)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
33
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than taupe · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than taupe · 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
39
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 53% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Silver rather than taupe· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than taupe · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Rose rather than taupe· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than taupe · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: a shimmering taupe with silver, pink & gold sparkle / a neutral taupe
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than taupe · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
e.l.f. Cosmetics Perfect 10 Eyeshadow Palette in Everyday Smoky, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Cobblestone. Matched on pan 4. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCobblestoneClosest shade matchEveryday SmokyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#9c847a#9c8176Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Format15%35StickPaletteDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%4024-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Multisculpt Matte Liquid Eyeshadow + All-Over Color in Tailor Grey, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Cobblestone. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCobblestoneClosest overall alternativeTailor GreyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%74#9c847a#9f7c6dClose colourColour difference 4.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$12 less (35%)
