Caviar Stick Eyeshadow Strapless dupes and alternatives Laura Mercier
4.5 (4,815)·Nude · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Both claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than nude· 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
30
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than nude· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Taupe rather than nude · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: taupe topper shimmer with silver flecks
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Taupe rather than nude· Powder rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than nude · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than nude· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (26%)4.8 (290)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Golden rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Golden rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Rose rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Rose rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
41
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Copper rather than nude· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than nude · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Taupe rather than nude· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 33% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Taupe rather than nude · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
MAC Cosmetics Veluxe Pearl Eyeshadow in All That Glitters, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Strapless. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeStraplessClosest shade matchAll That GlittersHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#b29188#b38e86Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Pro Longwear Paint Pot Cream Eyeshadow in Vintage Selection, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Strapless. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeStraplessClosest overall alternativeVintage SelectionHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%94#b29188#b69488Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $8 more
