Caviar Stick Eyeshadow Dune dupes and alternatives Laura Mercier
4.5 (4,815)·Nude · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Powder rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than nude· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than nude · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 53% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than nude· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 33% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (50%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Deeper· Peach rather than nude· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Peach rather than nude · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (18%)4.5 (671)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Lighter· Rose rather than nude· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Rose rather than nude · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Taupe rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Grey rather than nude· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than nude · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
33
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Ulta Beauty Collection Color Snack Eyeshadow Duo in Chocolate Bite, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Dune. Matched on pan 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDuneClosest shade matchChocolate BiteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#cd9988#ce9d8aVery close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall31
Finish65%20MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%4024-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 68/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Multisculpt Matte Liquid Eyeshadow + All-Over Color in Painterly, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Dune. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDuneClosest overall alternativePainterlyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%88#cd9988#d4a292Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90LightLightSameDepth difference 4.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 92/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$10 less (29%)
