Caviar Stick Eyeshadow Brick dupes and alternatives Laura Mercier
4.5 (4,815)·Brown · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (26%)4.6 (3,381)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (74%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Terracotta rather than brown· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Terracotta rather than brown · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than brown· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than brown · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than brown· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Plum rather than brown· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
46
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than brown · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
32
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Deeper· Mauve rather than brown· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Mauve rather than brown · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Peach rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Peach rather than brown · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Mauve rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Mauve rather than brown · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Pink rather than brown· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than brown · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Rose rather than brown· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Mauve rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Mauve rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (18%)4.5 (671)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Pink rather than brown· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than brown · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Ulta Beauty Collection Cream Eye Shadow Stick in You Rock!, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Brick. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBrickClosest shade matchYou Rock!How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#b2807d#b68179Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared32
Finish65%20MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%85StickCreamCloseCream rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall70
Longevity50%4024-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 73/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Ulta Beauty Collection Cream Eye Shadow Stick in Stay Neutral, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Brick. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBrickClosest overall alternativeStay NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour60%65#b2807d#a48279Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared97
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%85StickCreamCloseCream rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall70
Longevity50%4024-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 84/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$8 less (24%)
Sephora
