Caviar Stick Eyeshadow Modern Rose dupes and alternatives Laura Mercier
4.5 (4,815)·Pink · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: a shimmering medium pink / a blackened cherry
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: crushed pearl (shimmer), cool khaki, brown sugar
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than stick (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Mauve rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Mauve rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than pink· 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than pink · 11-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Brown rather than pink· Powder rather than stick (format)· 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than pink · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Taupe rather than pink· Powder rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than pink · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Jane Iredale ColorLuxe Eye Shadow Stick in Rosé, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Modern Rose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeModern RoseClosest matchRoséHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%91#b1817e#b57e7eVery close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 91/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$9 less (26%)
