Caviar Stick Eyeshadow Caramel dupes and alternatives Laura Mercier
4.5 (4,815)·Brown · Neutral · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 53% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Taupe rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Taupe rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Nude rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Nude rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: light brown with cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: stick
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (50%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Nude rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Nude rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Terracotta rather than brown· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Terracotta rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Deeper· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Nude rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Nude rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Nude rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Nude rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Nude rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Nude rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
46
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Golden rather than brown· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Golden rather than brown · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: soft tan with cool undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Golden rather than brown· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Golden rather than brown · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than brown· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than brown · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: true tan with neutral undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Grey rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than brown· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: a shimmering golden copper / a warm beige brown
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
33
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
ILIA Eye Stylus Shadow Stick - Long-Lasting Cream Eyeshadow in Faun, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Caramel. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCaramelClosest matchFaunHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#c8967c#c6977bLooks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNeutralNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall68
Longevity50%3524-hour wear12-hour wearDifferent12-hour wear claimed against 24-hour wear
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%0Normal, Dry, CombinationSensitiveDifferentMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 91/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$12 less (35%)
