Caviar Stick Eyeshadow Port Leather dupes and alternatives Laura Mercier
4.5 (4,815)·Plum · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
65
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 15-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Berry rather than plum· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than plum · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Berry rather than plum· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than plum · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than plum · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Normal rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than plum · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 53% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$22.01 less (65%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than plum · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (74%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Brown rather than plum· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than plum · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: deep brown with multi colored shimmer
Matches: Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than plum· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than plum · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than plum · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than plum· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than plum · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than plum· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 34% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than plum · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than plum· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than plum · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
62
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than plum · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than plum· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than plum · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 14-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than plum· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than plum · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: sparkling deep brown with red pearl
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than plum· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than plum · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than plum· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than plum · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: crushed pearl (shimmer), cool khaki, brown sugar
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than plum · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: metallic rustic reddish brown
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Red rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Red rather than plum · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (82%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than plum · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Plum Pop, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Port Leather. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePort LeatherClosest shade matchPlum PopHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%75#884345#784347Close colourColour difference 4.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 3.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PlumPlumSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall31
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%4024-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 62/100Shade match 84/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Revlon Glimmer Liquid Shadow in In Your Orbit, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Port Leather. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePort LeatherClosest overall alternativeIn Your OrbitHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour60%67#884345#984252Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 3.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PlumPlumSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall85
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%45StickLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than stick
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall48
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%0Normal, Dry, CombinationSensitiveDifferentMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 80/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$15.80 less (46%)
