Caviar Stick Eyeshadow Starlight dupes and alternatives Laura Mercier
4.5 (4,815)·Peach · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than peach· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 33% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than peach · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than peach· Powder rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than peach · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Golden rather than peach· Powder rather than stick (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
38
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than peach · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than peach· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than peach · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than peach· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than peach · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Pink rather than peach· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Looks identical · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than peach · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than peach· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than peach · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Lighter· Nude rather than peach· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Nude rather than peach · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick
Differences: Lighter· Pink rather than peach· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
68
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 33% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Pink rather than peach · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$8 less (24%)4.7 (1,256)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Pink rather than peach· Powder rather than stick (format)· 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
48
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than peach · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Rose rather than peach· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than peach · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than peach· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than peach · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Golden rather than peach· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Golden rather than peach · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: pale neutral with a silvery gold sparkle
Differences: Nude rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: stick
Differences: Taupe rather than peach· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Very close colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than peach · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Retailer shade note: golden metallic taupe with rich tawny shimmer/ holographic blushed gold with shifts of silver & gold sparkle
Matches: Same format: stick· Same longevity: 24-hour wear· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than peach· Satin rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than peach · Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, dry, combination (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than peach· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than peach · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Nude rather than peach· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than peach · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Natasha Denona LUXE GLAM COMPACT Quad Eyeshadow Palette in Cool, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Starlight. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeStarlightClosest shade matchCoolHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%94#cba8a1#cca7a3Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%4024-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Flare, against Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Starlight. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeStarlightClosest overall alternativeFlareHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%74#cba8a1#deafa3Close colourColour difference 4.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%88LightLightSameDepth difference 5.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PeachPeachSameSame colour family
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%33Normal, Dry, CombinationDryDifferentBoth marketed for dry skin
Overall match 83/100Shade match 83/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.