Lifter Plump & Glow Foundation Hyaluronic Acid 120 dupes and alternatives Maybelline
4.5 (1,466)·Light medium · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Not marketed for sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
76
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Adds SPF 50
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
76
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: golden beige shade with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
53
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: light - medium with neutral peach undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
53
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Light Medium with Neutral Undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims colour stability
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 29% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims colour stability
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Light-medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Radiant · Light-medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Light-medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Retailer shade note: Light Medium with warm golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims colour stability
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Light-medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Radiant · Light-medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Light-medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Retailer shade note: Light Medium with cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
53
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for dry/normal/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: light/medium skin w/ cool to neutral undertones
The closest shade to Maybelline Lifter Plump & Glow Foundation Hyaluronic Acid 120 (Light medium · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation in 2N2 Buff, against Maybelline Lifter Plump & Glow Foundation Hyaluronic Acid in 120. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade120Closest shade match2N2 BuffHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%99#e3a580#e5a57fLooks identicalColour difference 0.5 (0 is identical)
Overall match 78/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Juvia's Place I am Magic Natural Radiance Foundation in 630 Capri, against Maybelline Lifter Plump & Glow Foundation Hyaluronic Acid in 120. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade120Closest overall alternative630 CapriHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%90#e3a580#dfa075Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Overall match 91/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $2 more
