Lifter Plump & Glow Foundation Hyaluronic Acid 355 dupes and alternatives Maybelline
4.5 (1,466)·Deep tan · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium dark with cool undertone
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$7.99 less (50%)4.5 (40,486)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium dark with cool undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims colour stability
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium dark with neutral undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: M5.5 - medium-deep to deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium/tan skin tones with cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/dry/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same buildable coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium to deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Adds SPF 50
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: caramel brown shade with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very tan with yellow undertones
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$1.99 less (12%)3.9 (4,653)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 58% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium tan with a neutral undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for combination/dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium deep with rosy undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
76
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
The closest shade to Maybelline Lifter Plump & Glow Foundation Hyaluronic Acid 355 (Deep tan · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Laura Mercier Real Flawless Weightless Perfecting Waterproof Foundation in 5C1 Sepia, against Maybelline Lifter Plump & Glow Foundation Hyaluronic Acid in 355. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade355Closest shade match5C1 SepiaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#ad6743#ab613fVery close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Overall match 84/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Dior Forever Skin Glow Foundation in 6.5N Neutral, against Maybelline Lifter Plump & Glow Foundation Hyaluronic Acid in 355. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade355Closest overall alternative6.5N NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%92#ad6743#a86a45Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Overall match 86/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.