Lifter Plump & Glow Foundation Hyaluronic Acid 332 dupes and alternatives Maybelline
4.5 (1,466)·Medium tan · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Not marketed for sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
76
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium with golden red undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
99
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
53
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium - deep with warm golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
76
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for tan skin with olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same radiant finish
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: Medium-deep with neutral warm under
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same radiant finish
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: Medium with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims transfer resistance· Claims colour stability
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
The closest shade to Maybelline Lifter Plump & Glow Foundation Hyaluronic Acid 332 (Medium tan · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Polite Society More Than a Pretty Face Skin-Caring Foundation in Very Tan Warm, against Maybelline Lifter Plump & Glow Foundation Hyaluronic Acid in 332. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade332Closest shade matchVery Tan WarmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#c58555#c48353Looks identicalColour difference 0.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 91/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Juvia's Place I am Magic Natural Radiance Foundation in 505 Caracas, against Maybelline Lifter Plump & Glow Foundation Hyaluronic Acid in 332. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade332Closest overall alternative505 CaracasHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%96#c58555#c98855Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Overall match 93/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $8.01 more
Sephora
