Lifter Plump & Glow Foundation Hyaluronic Acid 210 dupes and alternatives Maybelline
4.5 (1,466)·Medium light · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Full rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Full rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 44% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/normal/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 32% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: tanned bronze with neutral undertone for dark skin
The closest shade to Maybelline Lifter Plump & Glow Foundation Hyaluronic Acid 210 (Medium light · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
L'Oréal Paris True Match Super-Blendable Foundation in W5.5 Warm Medium, against Maybelline Lifter Plump & Glow Foundation Hyaluronic Acid in 210. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade210Closest shade matchW5.5 Warm MediumHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%99#db986b#da996cLooks identicalColour difference 0.5 (0 is identical)
Overall match 82/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Juvia's Place I am Magic Natural Radiance Foundation in 630 Capri, against Maybelline Lifter Plump & Glow Foundation Hyaluronic Acid in 210. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade210Closest overall alternative630 CapriHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%91#db986b#dfa075Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Overall match 91/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $0.01 more
Sephora
