Lifter Plump & Glow Foundation Hyaluronic Acid 220 dupes and alternatives Maybelline
4.5 (1,466)·Medium light · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than buildable coverage· Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Not marketed for sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
76
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same radiant finish
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
53
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Light Medium with Warm Undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Light rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Light rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Light medium with cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium light, peach-beige undertones
Matches: Same buildable coverage· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims colour stability
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
53
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Light Medium with Neutral Undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
The closest shade to Maybelline Lifter Plump & Glow Foundation Hyaluronic Acid 220 (Medium light · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Alleyoop Sunsational Daily Skin Tint SPF 50 Tinted Mineral in Sunrise, against Maybelline Lifter Plump & Glow Foundation Hyaluronic Acid in 220. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade220Closest shade matchSunriseHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#dda37d#dfa37dLooks identicalColour difference 0.5 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared86
Finish35%100RadiantRadiantSameSame radiant finish
Coverage30%100BuildableLight-mediumCloseLight-medium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared40
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall20
Skin type100%20Combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 83/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Juvia's Place I am Magic Natural Radiance Foundation in 630 Capri, against Maybelline Lifter Plump & Glow Foundation Hyaluronic Acid in 220. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade220Closest overall alternative630 CapriHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%94#dda37d#dfa075Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 92/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $36.01 more
