Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than golden· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than golden · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Close colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Retailer shade note: pale neutral with a silvery gold sparkle
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than golden· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (32%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Peach rather than golden· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Peach rather than golden · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Rose rather than golden· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Kitten Shimmer, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Alien. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAlienClosest shade matchKitten ShimmerHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#e5b6a7#eabbadLooks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall77
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%60CreamLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall70
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 85/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Fenty Beauty Shadowstix Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Sip & Sparkle, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Alien. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAlienClosest overall alternativeSip & SparkleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%85#e5b6a7#eabeaaClose colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93LightLightSameDepth difference 3.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall86
Finish65%83MetallicGlitterCloseGlitter finish rather than metallic
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.