Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (59%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than purple · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Mauve rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Mauve rather than purple · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Mauve rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Mauve rather than purple · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Same skin types: dry
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Silver rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Silver rather than purple · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than purple· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
31
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than purple · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (68%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: pale periwinkle w/blue, pink & silver pinpoints
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (68%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than purple · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: cool-toned baby pink with silver and pink pinpoints
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Blue rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
33
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Blue rather than purple · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Midnight blue metallic with indigo & baby blue shimmer/Smoky lilac with opal sparkle
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
30
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than purple · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than purple· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
34
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than purple · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than purple· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
33
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than purple · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
e.l.f. Cosmetics Perfect 10 Eyeshadow Palette in So Bright Now, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Sundaze. Matched on pan 5. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSundazeClosest shade matchSo Bright NowHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%80#e2cbeb#ddc5dbClose colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall38
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 66/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Half Magic Eyeshadow Singles in Pixie Problems, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Sundaze. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSundazeClosest overall alternativePixie ProblemsHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall80
Colour60%73#e2cbeb#d5bae2Close colourColour difference 4.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%78LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 7.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall81
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 75/100Shade match 80/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.