Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering medium pink / a blackened cherry
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (59%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Pink Suede, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Pink Ice. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePink IceClosest shade matchPink SuedeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#e3a3a3#e0a4a4Looks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall46
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%73DryNormal, Dry, CombinationSome differenceBoth marketed for dry skin
Overall match 77/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Orgasm, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Pink Ice. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePink IceClosest overall alternativeOrgasmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%77#e3a3a3#f0b3b3Close colourColour difference 4.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%78LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 7.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall93
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance10% of overall67
Longevity50%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 83/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.