Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish)· Palette rather than cream (format)· 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: delicate beiges illuminated by a powder pink holo twist.
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: cream· Claims comfort
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than taupe · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Oily rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Brown rather than taupe· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Brown rather than taupe · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering golden copper / a warm beige brown
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Grey rather than taupe· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than taupe · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Grey rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Half Magic Eyeshadow Singles in Wet Pebble, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Nude 9. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNude 9Closest shade matchWet PebbleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#9f8471#a0816aVery close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall29
Finish65%5MatteMetallicDifferentMetallic finish rather than matte
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 67/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Fenty Beauty Shadowstix Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Get On Taupe, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Nude 9. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNude 9Closest overall alternativeGet On TaupeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%79#9f8471#a7816bClose colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $12 more
