Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than brown· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than brown · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than brown· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
36
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Taupe rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Taupe rather than brown · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (59%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Lighter· Grey rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Grey rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
46
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: cream· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Grey rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Grey rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim waterproof
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$8.01 less (36%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Same format: cream
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
24
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof
e.l.f. Cosmetics Perfect 10 Eyeshadow Palette in Everyday Smoky, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Chocolate. Matched on pan 7. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeChocolateClosest shade matchEveryday SmokyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%78#74655e#6e5c51Close colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%88Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 5.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 80/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Café Noir, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Chocolate. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeChocolateClosest overall alternativeCafé NoirHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall80
Colour60%68#74655e#765c53Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 3.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%73DryNormal, Dry, CombinationSome differenceBoth marketed for dry skin
Overall match 82/100Shade match 80/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.