Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (59%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish)· Palette rather than cream (format)· 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: delicate beiges illuminated by a powder pink holo twist.
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Silver rather than white
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Silver rather than white · Satin rather than matte (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than white· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than white · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Maybelline Shadow Drip Eye Tint Liquid Eye Shadow in Silver Drip, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Lift. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLiftClosest shade matchSilver DripHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#f5f1f3#f4f3f7Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100WhiteWhiteSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall28
Finish65%20MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%30OpaqueSheerDifferentSheer rather than opaque
Format15%60CreamLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared61
Longevity50%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 70/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Maybelline Color Tattoo Longwear Multi-Use Eyeshadow Stix in I Am Unmatched, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Lift. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLiftClosest overall alternativeI Am UnmatchedHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#f5f1f3#f6f3f1Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100WhiteWhiteSameSame colour family
Longevity50%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.