Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Golden rather than white· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than white · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Differences: Lighter· Nude rather than white· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Nude rather than white · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Nude rather than white
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Nude rather than white · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry, Normal, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Lighter· Golden rather than white· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Golden rather than white · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Glitter rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than white· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
46
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than white · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Golden rather than white· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Golden rather than white · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than white· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than white · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry, Normal, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Clinique All About Shadow Single Eyeshadow in French Vanilla, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Nude 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNude 3Closest shade matchFrench VanillaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%90#e5ccba#ecd5c5Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90LightLightSameDepth difference 4.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNeutralNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100WhiteWhiteSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall70
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared0
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%0DrySensitiveDifferentMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 84/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Vanilla Kiss, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Nude 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNude 3Closest overall alternativeVanilla KissHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%82#e5ccba#f1cfbcClose colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNeutralNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100WhiteWhiteSameSame colour family
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%73DryNormal, Dry, CombinationSome differenceBoth marketed for dry skin
Overall match 88/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $6 more
Walmart
