Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Green rather than golden· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Green rather than golden · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Visibly different colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry, Normal, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Nude rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than golden· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than golden · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Glitter rather than matte (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
33
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Glitter rather than matte (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Retailer shade note: sparkling sunlit gold with silver reflects
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (23%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: cream· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· White rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
34
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · White rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Nude rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (32%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Green rather than golden· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Green rather than golden · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: shimmer mint with pink reflects
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than golden· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than golden · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than golden· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than golden · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Nude rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Visibly different colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Nude rather than golden · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry, Normal, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than golden· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than golden · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Tower 28 Beauty GoGo Cooling Shimmer Stick 8H Eyeshadow in Chateau, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Nude 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNude 2Closest shade matchChateauHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#f0e4c9#f3e7d2Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared20
Finish65%5MatteMetallicDifferentMetallic finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%85CreamStickCloseStick rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared61
Longevity50%70Long-wearing8-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 8-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared62
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%73DryNormal, Dry, SensitiveSome differenceBoth marketed for dry skin
Overall match 67/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Kaja Beauty Bento Stacked Eyeshadow Trio in Neutral Moment, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Nude 2. Matched on pan 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNude 2Closest overall alternativeNeutral MomentHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour60%69#f0e4c9#fae1c0Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 82/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$6 less (27%)
Walmart
