Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than rose· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than rose · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than rose· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than rose · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than rose· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than rose · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than rose· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than rose · Powder rather than cream (format) · 14-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Nude rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Nude rather than rose · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (59%)4.2 (2,863)
Shimmer · Buildable
Differences: Deeper· Nude rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Nude rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Golden rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Golden rather than rose · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than rose· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than rose · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: modern beige, java jazz, & cocoa dip
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than rose· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than rose · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
bareMinerals Talc-Free Loose Mineral Eyeshadow in Soul, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Jewelz. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeJewelzClosest shade matchSoulHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour60%80#e8d0a6#f2d0a7Close colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 54/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in SUNNY, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Jewelz. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeJewelzClosest overall alternativeSUNNYHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall70
Colour60%79#e8d0a6#f9dbb3Close colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%84LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 6.4 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared0
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%0DryNormal, CombinationDifferentMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 72/100Shade match 70/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $6 more
