Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than terracotta· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than terracotta · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
68
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than terracotta · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Copper rather than terracotta· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than terracotta · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than terracotta· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than terracotta · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Peach rather than terracotta· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than terracotta · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: cream· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than terracotta· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than terracotta · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Retailer shade note: light brown with cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Peach rather than terracotta· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than terracotta · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Nude rather than terracotta· Powder rather than cream (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than terracotta · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims comfort
Differences: Golden rather than terracotta· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
51
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than terracotta · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than terracotta· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
68
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than terracotta · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Differences: Rose rather than terracotta· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than terracotta · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Deeper· Bronze rather than terracotta· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Bronze rather than terracotta · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$10.01 less (46%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than terracotta· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
46
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Copper rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Copper rather than terracotta · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 71/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Morphe ChromaPlus 6-Pan Eyeshadow Palette in Tailored Nudes, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Carrot Cake. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCarrot CakeClosest overall alternativeTailored NudesHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#d38d72#d58f72Looks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TerracottaTerracottaSameSame colour family
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 92/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $8 more
Sephora
