Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than purple· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than purple · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (68%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: metallic vivid violet with a blue duochrome flip
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than purple · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than purple· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Visibly different colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than purple · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Retailer shade note: burgundy metallic with taupe shimmer/copper rose foil with shifts of pink and gold sparkle
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than purple· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than purple · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: light purple with gold glitter
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
ColourPop Jelly Much Gel Eyeshadow Stick in Kinda Busy, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Journey. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeJourneyClosest shade matchKinda BusyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#b488aa#b189aaLooks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall79
Finish65%83MetallicGlitterCloseGlitter finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%85CreamStickCloseStick rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 84/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
about-face Fractal Glitter Eye Paint in Unfazed, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Journey. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeJourneyClosest overall alternativeUnfazedHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%77#b488aa#b47daaClose colourColour difference 4.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.