Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Purple rather than silver· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Purple rather than silver · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than silver· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than silver · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 15-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal rather than dry (skin types)
Retailer shade note: opaque silver with silver pearl
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (59%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same cool undertone
Differences: Lighter· Purple rather than silver· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Purple rather than silver · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (59%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: metallic
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· White rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · White rather than silver · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: opalescent white with blue, pink, and purple pearl
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Taupe rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Taupe rather than silver · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: duochrome mauve taupe with blue reflects
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Blue rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Blue rather than silver · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 15-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: light blue to lavendar duo chrome
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Blue rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Blue rather than silver · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal rather than dry (skin types)
Retailer shade note: holographic blue with pink pearl
MAC Cosmetics Small Molten Metallic Eyeshadow in Discotheque, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Lilac Flame. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLilac FlameClosest matchDiscothequeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%75#bcb1bd#b1adb4Close colourColour difference 4.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 3.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100SilverSilverSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%70Long-wearing10-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 10-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 84/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.