Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: sheer silver with gold and silver sparkle
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (59%)4.2 (2,863)
Shimmer · Buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than silver· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than silver · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Satin rather than metallic (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
43
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Satin rather than metallic (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (68%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· White rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · White rather than silver · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: opalescent white w/pink, violet & blue duochrome effects
MAC Cosmetics Dazzleshadow Liquid Eyeshadow in Silver Surfer, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Platinum. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePlatinumClosest shade matchSilver SurferHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%93#cbcdd1#c9c9caVery close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 2.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100SilverSilverSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall84
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%0DryNormalDifferentMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 85/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
R.E.M. Beauty Starlet Liquid Eyeshadow in Nebulous, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Platinum. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePlatinumClosest overall alternativeNebulousHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#cbcdd1#c8c8ceVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100SilverSilverSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%60CreamLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall82
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$7 less (32%)
