Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
No match is close enough in colour to recommend as an overall alternative (shade match under 70).
More matches
Show
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Green rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Green rather than blue · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format)
Retailer shade note: electric purple teal with green blue shift
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: icy baby blue with silver and aqua sparkle
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (32%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: duochrome icy blue with pink reflects
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
51
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: sheer iridescent blue sparkle
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Purple rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
24
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Purple rather than blue · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$10.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$11.50 less (52%)4.2 (1,248)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: cream· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Green rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
22
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Green rather than blue · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
26
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Golden rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
18
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Golden rather than blue · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (23%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same format: cream· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
41
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Retailer shade note: sparkling transparent icy blue with duo-chrome reflects
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Green rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
22
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Green rather than blue · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
30
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 15-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: light blue to lavendar duo chrome
Kaja Beauty Bento Stacked Eyeshadow Trio in Blueberry Bingsu, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Oasis. Matched on pan 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeOasisClosest shade matchBlueberry BingsuHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall66
Colour60%45#b0ddf2#c2d4e9Visibly different colourColour difference 8.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 2.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BlueBlueSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared23
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 50/100Shade match 66/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $4 more
Sephora
