Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Silver rather than green· Powder rather than cream (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than green · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than green· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than green · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Taupe rather than green
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Taupe rather than green · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than green· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than green · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than green· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than green · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (59%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than green· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than green · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: cream· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Grey rather than green
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Grey rather than green · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than green· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than green · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Taupe rather than green
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Taupe rather than green · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Taupe rather than green
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
13
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Taupe rather than green · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than green· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
38
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than green · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than green· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than green · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Silver rather than green· Glitter rather than matte (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
33
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than green · Glitter rather than matte (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Retailer shade note: metallic pewter silver with sparkling reflects
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Nude rather than green
Score details
Shade match
33
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Nude rather than green · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than green· Satin rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than green · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than green· Duochrome rather than matte (finish)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than green · Duochrome rather than matte (finish) · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Retailer shade note: taupe metallic with warm silvery shimmer/
holographic foil with shifts of pink, silver & gold sparkle
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Silver rather than green· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
42
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Silver rather than green · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Half Magic Eyeshadow Singles in Possessed Pearl, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Trooper. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTrooperClosest shade matchPossessed PearlHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour60%93#a99e97#a69b91Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 57/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Bobbi Brown Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick in Midnight Olive, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Trooper. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTrooperClosest overall alternativeMidnight OliveHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall73
Colour60%61#a99e97#9d9080Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%79MediumMediumSome differenceDepth difference 7.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreenGreenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall39
Finish65%20MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%85CreamStickCloseStick rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall67
Longevity50%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared73
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%73DryNormal, Dry, CombinationSome differenceBoth marketed for dry skin
Overall match 62/100Shade match 73/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.