Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (59%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: metallic
Differences: Silver rather than grey· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than grey · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: cream· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than grey· 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than grey · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than grey· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than grey · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than grey· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than grey · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Retailer shade note: metallic pewter silver with sparkling reflects
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (32%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than grey· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than grey · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Silver rather than grey
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Silver rather than grey · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than grey· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
38
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Visibly different colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than grey · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Retailer shade note: taupe metallic with warm silvery shimmer/
holographic foil with shifts of pink, silver & gold sparkle
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Green rather than grey
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Green rather than grey · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$8.01 less (36%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Silver rather than grey
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Silver rather than grey · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Silver rather than grey· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than grey · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Silver rather than grey
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Silver rather than grey · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 15-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Silver rather than grey
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Silver rather than grey · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Blue rather than grey· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Blue rather than grey · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 15-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: light blue to lavendar duo chrome
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Silver rather than grey
Score details
Shade match
38
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Silver rather than grey · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal rather than dry (skin types)
Retailer shade note: opaque silver with silver pearl
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than grey· Matte rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than grey · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Blue rather than grey
Score details
Shade match
30
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Visibly different colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Blue rather than grey · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Dry, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Retailer shade note: smoky steel metallic with gunmetal shimmer/
holographic opal foil with indigo & liliac sparkle
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Green rather than grey
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Green rather than grey · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Silver rather than grey
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Silver rather than grey · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Silver rather than grey
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Silver rather than grey · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same format: cream· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Matte rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Lancôme Ombre Hypnôse Stylo Shadow Stick Matte Metallics in 05 Erika F, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Odyssey. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeOdysseyClosest match05 Erika FHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall76
Colour60%77#a2a6a1#a6a498Close colourColour difference 4.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 76/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (59%)
Sephora
