Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Same skin types: dry
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: sheer silvery baby pink with silver and pink sparkle
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than pink· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than pink · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: cream· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: champagne cream, ballerina pink, & deep plum
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Rose rather than pink · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Danessa Myricks Beauty Twin Flames Liquid Eyeshadow in Love Spell, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Bunny. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBunnyClosest matchLove SpellHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#f5d3de#f9d6ddVery close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall69
Finish65%61ShimmerDuochromeSome differenceDuochrome finish rather than shimmer
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 84/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$3 less (14%)
