Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than peach· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Looks identical · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than peach · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Rose rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than peach· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than peach · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Golden rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Golden rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Golden rather than peach· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Golden rather than peach · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$7 less (32%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than peach· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than peach · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than peach· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than peach · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 15-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Deeper· Golden rather than peach· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Golden rather than peach · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Taupe rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Taupe rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a greyish taupe with a hint of shimmer.
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (59%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Very close colour
Differences: Nude rather than peach· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than peach · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Urban Decay 24/7 Eyeshadow in Introvert, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Flare. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFlareClosest shade matchIntrovertHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%83#deafa3#e8ab9cClose colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PeachPeachSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall38
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDryNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 69/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Starlight, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Flare. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFlareClosest overall alternativeStarlightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%74#deafa3#cba8a1Close colourColour difference 4.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%88LightLightSameDepth difference 5.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PeachPeachSameSame colour family
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%73DryNormal, Dry, CombinationSome differenceBoth marketed for dry skin
Overall match 84/100Shade match 83/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$10.01 less (46%)
