Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: cream· Claims comfort
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than nude· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than nude · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than nude · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than nude· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than nude · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than nude· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than nude · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: delicate beiges illuminated by a powder pink holo twist.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than nude · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Oily rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than nude· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than nude · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
46
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Grey rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Grey rather than nude · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering taupe with silver, pink & gold sparkle / a neutral taupe
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
46
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry (skin types)
Retailer shade note: brushed gold with silver shimmer
Differences: Silver rather than nude· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than nude · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Dry, Normal, Combination, Oily, Sensitive rather than dry (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than nude· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than nude · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than nude· Metallic rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
20
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than nude · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Cobblestone, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Nude 8. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNude 8Closest matchCobblestoneHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall76
Colour60%90#9e8779#9c847aVery close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%73DryNormal, Dry, CombinationSome differenceBoth marketed for dry skin
Overall match 81/100Shade match 76/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$11.50 less (52%)
