Eyeshadow Singles Beauty Junkie dupes and alternatives Ulta Beauty Collection
4.2 (2,863)·Mauve · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 11-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Purple rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Purple rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: shimmering soft mauve with hidden pearl
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Plum rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Lighter· Taupe rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Lighter · Taupe rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: taupe topper shimmer with silver flecks
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Purple rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Purple rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Sephora Collection Colorful Eyeshadow in 314 Fantasia, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Beauty Junkie. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBeauty JunkieClosest match314 FantasiaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%91#a87c7c#a97d82Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumLightCloseDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 82/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.