Eyeshadow Singles Say What dupes and alternatives Ulta Beauty Collection
4.2 (2,863)·Peach · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Nude rather than peach· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Nude rather than peach · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Terracotta rather than peach· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Terracotta rather than peach · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than peach· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than peach · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: White rather than peach· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than peach · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: matte cream with subtle pink undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than peach· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
22
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than peach · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than peach· Glitter rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
18
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than peach · Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than peach· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than peach · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Nude rather than peach· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than peach · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Tower 28 Beauty GoGo Cooling Shimmer Stick 8H Eyeshadow in Troubadour, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Say What. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSay WhatClosest shade matchTroubadourHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%94#eebe94#efc29dVery close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 56/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Jane Iredale PurePressed Eye Shadow Triple in Honeysuckle, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Say What. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSay WhatClosest overall alternativeHoneysuckleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall77
Colour60%91#eebe94#f6bd8eVery close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 77/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $29 more
Walmart
