Eyeshadow Singles Whatevs dupes and alternatives Ulta Beauty Collection
4.2 (2,863)·Nude · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: shimmer· Claims hydration
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
MAC Cosmetics Pro Longwear Paint Pot Cream Eyeshadow in Soft Ochre, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Whatevs. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWhatevsClosest shade matchSoft OchreHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%85#dfc1a2#e2bc95Very close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall74
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%40Not listed24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 78/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Ulta Beauty Collection Color Snack Eyeshadow Duo in Peanut Butter Crunch, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Whatevs. Matched on the lighter eyeshadow pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWhatevsClosest overall alternativePeanut Butter CrunchHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%76#dfc1a2#dec8b4Close colourColour difference 4.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 2.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 84/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.