Eyeshadow Singles Do The Most dupes and alternatives Ulta Beauty Collection
4.2 (2,863)·Golden · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: sheer gold with multi-color sparkle
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than golden· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than golden · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering neutral beige / a rich navy blue
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than golden· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than golden · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Milani Gilded Eyeshadow Sticks in Sand, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Do The Most. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDo The MostClosest shade matchSandHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#c2a895#c4a793Looks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared76
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 83/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique All About Shadow Duo Eyeshadow in Day Into Date, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Do The Most. Matched on the lighter eyeshadow pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDo The MostClosest overall alternativeDay Into DateHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%85#c2a895#cfaf98Close colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90LightLightSameDepth difference 4.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.