Eyeshadow Singles So Dreamy dupes and alternatives Ulta Beauty Collection
4.2 (2,863)·Pink · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Lighter· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: sparkling flamingo pink with an opalescent shift
Differences: Lighter· Mauve rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Mauve rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: sparkling fuchsia pink with silver reflects
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: peach pink with hot pink sparkle
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Morphe ChromaPlus 12-Pan Eyeshadow Palette in Rose Frequency, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in So Dreamy. Matched on pan 9. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSo DreamyClosest shade matchRose FrequencyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%80#c56d80#c5727aClose colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall31
Finish65%5MetallicMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%100PowderPaletteCloseBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Overall match 64/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ColourPop Super Shock Shadow in Roy G. Biv, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in So Dreamy. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSo DreamyClosest overall alternativeRoy G. BivHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%76#c56d80#c46470Close colourColour difference 4.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared86
Finish65%83MetallicGlitterCloseGlitter finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Overall match 79/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $33 more
