Eyeshadow Singles Glimmer dupes and alternatives Ulta Beauty Collection
4.2 (2,863)·Copper · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Peach rather than copper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than copper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Mauve rather than copper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than copper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Terracotta rather than copper· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 35% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than copper · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
e.l.f. Cosmetics Perfect 10 Eyeshadow Palette in Keep It Ethereal, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Glimmer. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGlimmerClosest shade matchKeep It EtherealHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#c37763#c57863Looks identicalColour difference 0.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100CopperCopperSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall31
Finish65%5MetallicMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%100PowderPaletteCloseBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Overall match 71/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Bite Size Eyeshadow Palette in Cream & Sugar, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Glimmer. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGlimmerClosest overall alternativeCream & SugarHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%68#c37763#bc8064Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100CopperCopperSameSame colour family
Overall match 79/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.