Eyeshadow Singles Disco Queen dupes and alternatives Ulta Beauty Collection
4.2 (2,863)·Silver · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: opaque silver with silver pearl
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 14-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: metallic pewter silver with sparkling reflects
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Blue rather than silver· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Blue rather than silver · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 15-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: light blue to lavendar duo chrome
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Matte rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than silver· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than silver · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: icy lavender with a blue opal duochrome flip
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Grey rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Grey rather than silver · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Morphe ChromaPlus 6-Pan Eyeshadow Palette in Cyber Chrome, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Disco Queen. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDisco QueenClosest shade matchCyber ChromeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall76
Colour60%65#a8afb3#a2a1a6Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%83LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 6.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100SilverSilverSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall31
Finish65%5MetallicMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%100PowderPaletteCloseBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Overall match 58/100Shade match 76/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Small Molten Metallic Eyeshadow in Discotheque, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Disco Queen. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDisco QueenClosest overall alternativeDiscothequeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall75
Colour60%59#a8afb3#b1adb4Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100SilverSilverSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Overall match 74/100Shade match 75/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $17 more
Sephora
