Eyeshadow Singles Chocolate Bite dupes and alternatives Ulta Beauty Collection
4.2 (2,863)·Brown · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Peach rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Lighter· Nude rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Nude rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 35% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
19
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
MAC Cosmetics Pro Longwear Paint Pot Cream Eyeshadow in Bare Study, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Chocolate Bite. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeChocolate BiteClosest shade matchBare StudyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%96#dfb9a1#dfb9a4Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 77/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Ulta Beauty Collection Color Snack Eyeshadow Duo in Chocolate Bite, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Chocolate Bite. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeChocolate BiteClosest overall alternativeChocolate BiteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall77
Colour60%81#dfb9a1#edbda6Close colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93LightLightSameDepth difference 3.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 77/100Shade match 77/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $3 more
Sephora
