Eyeshadow Singles Frozen dupes and alternatives Ulta Beauty Collection
4.2 (2,863)·White · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than white· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than white · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Lighter· Silver rather than white· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Silver rather than white · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Silver rather than white· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than white · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: opaque silver with silver pearl
Differences: Silver rather than white· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than white · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: sheer silver with gold and silver sparkle
Differences: Silver rather than white· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than white · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: sheer silver with gold and silver sparkle
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than white· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than white · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 14-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
MAC Cosmetics Small Glitter Eyeshadow in Twinkle, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Frozen. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFrozenClosest shade matchTwinkleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%95#d6d1c9#dbd6ccLooks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100WhiteWhiteSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared74
Finish65%68ShimmerGlitterSome differenceGlitter finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Overall match 81/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique All About Shadow Single Eyeshadow in Sugar Cane, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Frozen. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFrozenClosest overall alternativeSugar CaneHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%79#d6d1c9#e6dfd9Close colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%80LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 7.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100WhiteWhiteSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.