Eyeshadow Singles Sparkling Maple dupes and alternatives Ulta Beauty Collection
4.2 (2,863)·Brown · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: sparkling deep brown with red pearl
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: metallic rustic reddish brown
Milani Gilded Eyeshadow Sticks in Canyon, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Sparkling Maple. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSparkling MapleClosest shade matchCanyonHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#774a45#7a4a48Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared76
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Overall match 82/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Patrick Ta Major Dimension Eye Illusion Eyeshadow Duo in Still At The Club, against Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Sparkling Maple. Matched on the deeper eyeshadow pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSparkling MapleClosest overall alternativeStill At The ClubHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%84#774a45#70433aClose colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%91Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 4.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall93
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%100PowderPaletteCloseBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Overall match 84/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $17 more
